Tuesday, December 31, 2013

The water is turquoise.

You have to do a bunch of hustling if you want to relax in Anguilla. Not that this is anything I've ever done before, nor would it be a plan I'd formulate, left to my own devices. But when Allen's niece scheduled her destination wedding for the Caribbean in December, I wasn't going to pass on such an adventure.
there's a Caribbean down there...

Wintry mix was threatening to precipitate on the morning of our departure and, thanks to Murphy, we first had to get from Baltimore to the slightly sloppier latitude of Philly for our flight out of the country. But the freezy stuff held off--just until we took off--and I relaxed a smidge.

Once you land in St Martin (or we should say, since the airport's on the Dutch side, Sint Maarten,) it's time to hand over your passport to one person, and $20 to someone else. Chances are, there's a bit of paperwork, with blanks to fill in, a gate or two, a shuttle ride, another $20, someone else takes your passport, a boat ride, another gate (after $20,) another shuttle, passports again...then they drop you off at your hotel. For twenty dollars.

Plan on $40, and a couple of passport handovers to get through Blowing Point.
By then you're thoroughly relaxed, because you're in the Caribbean, meeting 38 new people.

At the Viceroy resort, on the west end of Anguilla, they want you to want to buy a villa. So they will leave a card in your room inviting you to a " manager's reception," and the maid will, each of the 2-3 times per day she fusses with your room, leave the tv on and tuned to the resort's own station which features crisp shots of what you'd see if you weren't inside looking at the tv. Except in that the people you'll actually see are probably not models.

But since you really are there, you'll go outside, swim in the sea, eat fruit, and decide that if you could obtain a prawn sandwich where the bun is a sliced johnnycake, back in your real life, you might even be willing to overpay for it. But probably not for all the leftover slices of red velvet wedding cake they serve at breakfast.

Well, I'm not sure you'd do just those things, but I recommend them. I also recommend renting a car so you can drive (On the left! On the left!) away from the cool glitzy marble-esqueness of the Viceroy, to distant island points where goats and dog play chicken with your car. As do chickens.
Frolicking goat
Cow, not exactly frolicking.
In spite of the rain which fell sporadically (and one night while we ate under a covered pavilion, horizontally,) we did relax. There was not much else we could do, outside of the wedding festivities.
Cacti at Junk's Hole, east end.
Volcanic rock instead of beach down this way.
We are thinking that, should we return, we may stay on St. Martin and save ourselves 3 or 4 gates, handing over of the passports, and $20 handoffs. Then again, Nags Head is closer.

Monday, December 23, 2013

We won't all agree, but it's ok.

“Anonymous,” in a follow up comment to a recent blog post of mine, raised an interesting question. Would I--were it one of my children who had recently died after a lengthy illness--add a “replacement” (my word) child, and blog about it?

 I’m not sure the analogy quite works, but I grasp the point. Is it seemly, in blog posts or any open forum, to express the happiness that my significant other adds to my life so soon after the passing of my spouse, not to mention during the time he was lingering in the Limbo of late-stage Alzheimer’s?

 I understand where/why some people would question the choice. It could be construed as dismissive of the enormity of the value of Jeff’s lost life. It could suggest that I’m not feeling the normal and expected emotions that accompany death of a life partner. There is just not enough wearing of the widow’s black going on, metaphorically speaking.

 Don’t be fooled. A happy aspect to life has not squelched the feelings that burble to the surface unexpectedly, filling me with visceral, almost tangible, memories of Jeff and our beautiful relationship of half a lifetime. I can’t imagine that there will ever come a time where I won’t miss him and won’t regret missing out on living out life with him.

 And the other thing is: I kind of agree with you. It’s not quite seemly. So I will offer either a defense or an explanation (I’m not sure which it is.) I was emotionally flat for many years, suppressing feelings as a way of coping with a partner who could no longer partner, and ultimately not even know me. When seedlings of happy begin to uncurl their little green leaves on what looked to be pretty barren ground, it’s hard to keep them secret. It’s a bit irrepressible.

 There is also this--I want to be fair to others in my position who may be wondering about the possibility of new growth after huge loss. Even with Barry Petersen having “come out” about having a new partner while caring for a spouse who no longer knows him (see Jan's story) it would be easy for less renowned Alzheimer’s spouses to feel that such a choice will come with stigma. That it's something that should remain untalked about. I would rather encourage dialog than hide.

 Some would make this choice, some would not. There are plenty of reasons pointing both ways. But I’m inclined to reject the instinct to disappear and not talk about it, as a spouse then widow who is loving again. Frankly, I am ok with anyone telling me how he/she feels. I would accept honesty and respond with honesty.

 I Google-stumbled across this Psychology Today article when I was sifting for thoughts on this topic. This is a column by a philosopher, not a summary of a scientific study, so read it as such. Here is a decent encapsulation and quote about the complexity of loving more than one person:

Although a new love might physically replace the previous one, from a psychological viewpoint the widow will now love two people at the same time. Her love expresses the nonexclusive nature of love more than it does its replaceable nature. Thus, one widow writes: "'Second love' is different, but it's very good. I will always love and miss my late husband. It's really hard to understand sometimes how I can go from tears for my late husband into smiling and thinking of my new guy. There's an odd ‘divide'. I love both of them, one here and one gone." It seems that we are blessed with a heart that is very flexible and can accommodate various people at the same time.
Yes, pretty much. Again noting that these are the thoughts of a philosopher, not the findings of a scientist, it’s interesting that he refers more than once to the idea that the world may judge widows a little more harshly than others where new relationships are concerned.

I had to think about this. Yes, here’s the thing: We earn some super-good karma points through what we do, as Alzheimer’s spouses. Even though we’re just handling the cards life dealt us, it’s a tough road, and people are appropriately inclined to notice, with admiration. Maybe, by not waiting “long enough” (whatever that is,) to reclaim the right to love, we forfeit some of that karma.

The writer of the article, Aaron Ben-Zeév, makes the valid point that it is probably somewhat easier NOT to enter another relationship, and that sentiment has certainly been expressed by fellow Alzheimer spouses I know. There are some mighty complex and confusing emotions to sort through if you do, and you need to be pretty good at untangling the whys and hows of your feelings.

For me, I was pretty much carried by an awareness that there was a vacancy in my heart for one more. That drove my willingness and actions. So, no apologies. I love Jeff. I love Allen. I’m happy to discuss it, openly and frankly, with anyone.

Saturday, December 07, 2013

Thanksgiving Project

There are a variety of methods suggested for mounting an amateur radio antenna high in the treetops. You might actually climb the tree, or you might rig up some kind of bow and arrow. I engaged the tools and skills of tree-climbing daughter Rachel who, in this instance, didn’t actually have to climb. Using her giant arborist-quality slingshot, she fired a weighted bag up and over the branches, and it pulled an attached line with it. 

What happened next is best described by this page, which provides instruction for hanging an antenna by means of “tree savers,” which are comprised of a length of webbing with stainless rings at each end, through which a parachute line halyard will be threaded in order to hoist the three points (center insulator, and the end of each copper wire “leg”) of a dipole antenna into their roosts.

I had prepared the strap and ring assemblies, according to instruction, but was having trouble visualizing exactly how the mounting procedure would work. So Allen and I simulated it, using the backs of kitchen chairs as branches, until the 3-Ds of the process became clear. Then, on the lovely sunny Friday after Thanksgiving, we went to work.

With all in place, there is still a glitch. The 1970s vintage Kenwood TS 530S transceiver with which Allen had been gifted by a late acquaintance, while beautiful and sharp in its receptive abilities, seems to be impaired in the transmitting department.

We will have to do something about that. There is no way for me to jump in and help save the world in the face of man-made or natural disasters if I don’t have a functioning rig with battery back-up. Perhaps I will buy something. 


KC3BKR (Yes, I passed both the Tech and General Amateur Radio Operator licensing exams this Fall,) signing off for now.
Taking aim at the big tree
It's pretty high.
positioning the south corner wire

Getting a bead on tree #2, southeast corner.


There was quite a bit of line detangling to stay on top of.
Critical audience

Em's mom came to watch too.


hoisting a leg of the antenna.

Can't transmit!
weirdos